Handgun

7x45mm Ingram

A 7mm-on-.223-Improved Contender wildcat (also written 7mm x 223 Improved)..

Caliber
0.284″ · 7.214 mm
Case
Bottleneck
Parent
.223 Remington
Status
Wildcat
Velocity1,800–2,400 fps
Energy1,000–1,777 ft·lb · est.
Identity
Type
Handgun
Status
Wildcat
Availability
Rare
Build
Primer
Small Rifle
Pressure & range
Eff. range
150 yd

Ballistics

Representative trajectory · 100 yd zero0–800 yd
100 yd · zero0″−169″169″ drop @ 800 yd0400800Open in Ballistic Compare ↗
Parent case
.223 Remington

Representative trajectory — modeled from a single velocity input (no published BC for this cartridge yet).

Dimensionscase measurements · scale drawing · size vs familiar rounds

Case dimensions — the scale drawing at the top of the page is built from these.

reloading data · approximate
Measuremmin
Bullet ⌀7.210.284·
Neck ⌀7.720.304·
Shoulder ⌀9.270.365·
Shoulder angle45°~
Base ⌀9.550.376·
Rim ⌀9.600.378·
Belt ⌀n/a
Rim thickness1.140.045·
Neck length5.820.229
Case length44.701.760·
Overall length68.202.685·

Size vs familiar rounds

Drawn at true 1:1 — every case is accurate relative to the others. Absolute size depends on your screen's pixel density, so measuring one against a real ruler may be off. 7x45mm Ingram is highlighted below.

Reloading costestimate cost per round vs factory

Estimate your cost per round and how it compares to factory. Inputs are yours — nothing is stored.

Cost estimate only — not load data. Charge weight is your input; follow published manuals for safe charges.

Connected reference

History

A 7mm-on-.223-Improved Contender wildcat (also written 7mm x 223 Improved).

FAQs

What bullet diameter is 7x45mm Ingram?
7x45mm Ingram uses a 0.284″ (7.214 mm) diameter bullet.
Is 7x45mm Ingram still in production?
7x45mm Ingram is wildcat; typical availability is rare.
What is 7x45mm Ingram based on?
7x45mm Ingram is derived from the .223 Remington case.

Sources & provenance

Data & sources. Specs compiled from the Lindcott Armory reference; the trajectory is modeled (point-mass), not measured. See methodology. Spotted an error? Report it →